2 Jun 2026
Resorts World Casino Engages New York Regulators on Horseracing Payment Obligations

Resorts World, which opened New York City’s first full-scale casino in April 2026 at the Aqueduct Racetrack site in Queens, now finds itself in discussions with the New York State Gaming Commission regarding annual “racing support” payments to the state’s horseracing industry; the company maintains these obligations form part of its 56 percent tax rate commitment, yet the Commission treats them as separate requirements that must be met independently, and the projected amounts reach at least $150 million each year with totals potentially exceeding $500 million across four years.
Background on the Casino’s Tax Structure
Under the terms of its operating bid Resorts World agreed to a 56 percent tax rate on gaming revenue, and the company contends this rate already incorporates the racing support contributions that flow to New York’s horseracing sector, while state officials counter that the payments sit outside the tax calculation and therefore require distinct transfers, creating a clear difference in interpretation that both sides are now addressing through proposed legislative language.
The casino’s proposal would redirect the racing support amounts directly from the commercial gaming revenue fund rather than requiring Resorts World to issue separate checks, and this approach aims to align the payment mechanism with existing revenue distribution channels already managed by the state.
Details of the Payment Dispute
Figures released in early June 2026 show the annual racing support obligation starting at a minimum of $150 million and climbing across the initial four-year period, which would push cumulative transfers beyond $500 million if current projections hold; Resorts World argues these sums were factored into the overall 56 percent tax burden accepted during the licensing process, whereas the Gaming Commission views the racing support line item as an additional statutory requirement not subsumed by the tax rate itself.
Data from the Commercial Casinos page maintained by the New York State Gaming Commission lists tax rates and fund allocations for each licensed operator, yet it does not explicitly resolve how racing support payments interact with those rates, leaving room for the current disagreement to surface once operations began.
Legislative Proposal and Next Steps

Resorts World has advanced draft legislation that would instruct the commercial gaming revenue fund to make the racing support payments automatically, thereby removing the need for the operator to handle the transfers separately; the measure seeks to clarify the original intent of the tax rate bid and to streamline compliance for all parties involved in the state’s expanding casino sector.
Observers note that similar fund-based collection mechanisms already exist for other statutory obligations tied to commercial gaming, so the proposal would bring racing support payments into line with those established processes rather than creating an entirely new administrative pathway.
Timeline and Current Status
The casino opened its doors in April 2026, and the payment question gained prominence in the weeks that followed once the first revenue reports were prepared; by June 2026 both the operator and the Gaming Commission had publicly outlined their positions, and the legislative language put forward by Resorts World now sits before state lawmakers for consideration during the current session.
Those who have followed New York’s commercial casino rollout point out that the racing support requirement stems from earlier state statutes designed to sustain the horseracing industry, and the present dispute centers on whether those statutes were meant to operate independently of the tax rates offered in competitive bids.
Conclusion
The outcome of the proposed legislation will determine how Resorts World and future operators calculate and remit racing support obligations, with the Gaming Commission continuing to administer the commercial gaming revenue fund while lawmakers weigh the clarification requested by the Queens facility; until a resolution is reached the company and regulators maintain their respective positions on whether the 56 percent tax rate already encompasses the payments or whether separate transfers remain mandatory.